Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 75
Trivansky Swington v. Mt. Pleasant Correctional etc., et al
as 14-2303
Plaintiff - Appellee: Trivansky Swington
Defendant - Appellee: Mt. Pleasant Correctional Facility, Ron Mullen, Bill Stump and others
Wood v. Ludwick
as 4:2014cv00180
Petitioner: Timothy Michael Wood
Respondent: Nick Ludwick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WOODS v. LEMMON et al
as 1:2014cv00561
Defendant: CLAIRE BROWN, VICKIE BURDINE, ANDREW COLE and others
Plaintiff: MICHAEL WOODS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODS v. COOKE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00079
Defendant: NURSE CLARK, C. COOKE, OFFICER CULVAHOUSE and others
Plaintiff: MICHAEL WOODS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Virga We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2014cv00077
Petitioner: Michael Woods
Respondent: Tim Virga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WOODS v. ZATECKY
as 1:2013cv01349
Petitioner: MICHAEL WOODS
Respondent: ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WOODS v. ZATECKY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01348
Petitioner: MICHAEL WOODS
Respondent: ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Virga We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv00009
Petitioner: Michael Woods
Respondent: Tim Virga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Quiroz v. JC Penney et al
as 3:2012cv00873
Plaintiff: Everon Quiroz
Defendant: JC Penney, Pam Spaich, Michael Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Izell Rivers v. Warden, et al
as 12-16548
Plaintiff - Appellant: IZELL RIVERS
Defendant - Appellee: WARDEN, MICHAEL WOODS, JR., Sgt CO2, MICHAEL DANLEY, Col and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?