Cases 41 - 50 of 76
Darwin Walden v. Charlie Higgins, et al
as 10-2862
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Darwin Burnett Walden
Defendant - Appellee:
Charlie Higgins, Andrea Wright, Marie Carter and others
Raymond Wattison v. Mary Carter, et al
as 10-16778
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND WATTISON
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY CARTER, CRAIG MADIEROS, DON HELLING and others
Carter v. Cooper
as 5:2010ct03133
Plaintiff:
Mary Carter
Defendant:
Mr. Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beverly Jones, et al v. Gladys Deese, et al
as 10-12559
Interested Party - Appellant:
BEVERLY JO JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
GLADYS DEESE, Warden of Julia Tutwiler Prison for Women, in her official capacity,, MARY CARTER, Director of Birmingham Work Release Center, in her official capacity, RONALD CAVANAUGH, Treatment Director, ADOC and others
Harris v. Skolnik et al
as 2:2010cv00365
Defendant:
James Baca, Cheryl Burson, Mary Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Broadhead v. Wise et al
as 4:2010cv00388
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
David Wise, Mary Carter, C Thomas and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bey v. Allen et al
as 4:2009cv02425
Plaintiff:
Richard Wayne Wright Bey, Sr
Defendant:
Richard Allen, James DeLoach, Gwendolyn Mosley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. Gardner et al
as 4:2009cv01258
Plaintiff:
Henry Lee Ford, III
Defendant:
Deborah Gardner, D. Wise, Mary Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. Wise et al
as 4:2009cv01208
Plaintiff:
Henry Lee Ford, III
Defendant:
D. Wise, Mary Carter, Deborah Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quick v. Carter et al
as 5:2009cv00950
Petitioner:
Robbie Quick
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The and Mary Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
