Cases 41 - 50 of 140
HEAD-MATTINGLY v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 2:2017cv00572
Petitioner:
BRETT A. HEAD-MATTINGLY
Respondent:
WARDEN
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Maloney et al
as 1:2017cv01475
Plaintiff:
Adam C Smith
Defendant:
Corey Maloney, Kurt Bode, Robert C Bollinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maldonado v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2017cv06618
Plaintiff:
Franklin Maldonado
Defendant:
City Of New York , Horizon Juvenile Center , Administration for Children Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Whillheim et al
as 1:2017cv05793
Plaintiff:
Kent Davis
Defendant:
Erica Whillheim, Cynthia Arreola, Amy B. Milano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Whillheim et al
as 1:2017cv05383
Plaintiff:
Kent Davis
Defendant:
Erica Whillheim, Cynthia Arreola, Amy B. Milano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mattingly v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv00261
Petitioner:
Casey Stuart Mattingly
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Webster v. Himmelbach et al
as 6:2016cv06581
Plaintiff:
James Edward Webster
Defendant:
M. Himmelbach, S. Mattingly, Tina Stanford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Prince George's County Police Department et al
as 1:2016cv02703
Plaintiff:
Thomas Kevin Jenkins
Defendant:
Prince George's County Police Department, Sean M. Mischo, Duane May and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JENKINS v. PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2016cv01334
Plaintiff:
THOMAS KEVIN JENKINS
Defendant:
PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, SEAN M. MISCHO, DUANE MAY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lovette v. Bowen et al
as 3:2016cv00258
Plaintiff:
Steven Lovette
Defendant:
Neil Bowen, Dan Miller, M. Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
