Cases 41 - 50 of 1,701
Mendez v. United States Of America
as 4:2023cv02790
Petitioner:
Juan Albert Mendez
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
(PC) Wright v. Amanda et al
as 2:2023cv01532
Plaintiff:
Dewayne A. Wright
Defendant:
Amanda, Tracy, Mendez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mendez v. Lumpkin
as 7:2023cv00241
Petitioner:
Eugenio Fernandez Mendez
Respondent:
Warden Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. Donna L. Mendez, et al
as 5:2023cv00904
Plaintiff:
Lowell Quincy Green
Defendant:
Donna L. Mendez, et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Mendez, et al.
as 5:2023cv00890
Plaintiff:
Lowell Green
Defendant:
Jessica Mendez, et al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Superville Jr. v. Irving et al
as 1:2023cv00911
Plaintiff:
Dexter E Superville Jr.
Defendant:
Antionette V. Irving, Twitty, Gangwer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mendez v. Lumpkin et al
as 5:2023cv00868
Petitioner:
Jesse Mendez
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin and Texas Board of Pardons/Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Bonilla v. Mendez
as 2:2023cv01366
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
John A. Mendez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mendez-Matos v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00247
Petitioner:
Leucy Mendez-Matos
Respondent:
R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Green v. Mendez et al
as 5:2023cv00843
Plaintiff:
Lowell Green
Defendant:
Donna L. Mendez, Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals and Pro Se Clerk, et al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
