Cases 41 - 50 of 7,236
Miller v. University of Texas Medical BRanch et al
as 6:2015cv00382
Plaintiff:
Robert Miller
Defendant:
University of Texas Medical BRanch, Rick Thaler, Yesenia Beltran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Thaler
as 6:2015cv00276
Plaintiff:
Roberto Perez, Jr
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, John A Rupert, Larry G Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fountain v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2015cv00271
Plaintiff:
Freddie Fountain
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Brad Livingston, Rick Thaler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bagby v. Thaler et al
as 1:2015cv00513
Plaintiff:
Cedric Wayne Bagby
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, Sr., Vogelasein, Beach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Coleman v. Alfreda Carrieon, et al
as 15-10187
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN ARICK COLEMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
LIEUTENANT ALFREDA D. CARRIEON, JULIE M. EVANS, SERGEANT BRYAN W. ADAMS and others
Humphrey v. Hunter et al
as 9:2015cv00037
Petitioner:
Brison Keith Humphrey
Respondent:
Gary Hunter, Donald Muniz, Richard Langley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jose Magana Suria v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-40315
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSE MANUEL MAGANA SURIA
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Sidney v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2015cv00459
Petitioner:
Curley J Sidney
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McGowen v. Livingston et al
as 5:2015cv00026
Plaintiff:
Joseph Kent McGowen
Respondent:
Brad Livingston, William Stephens, Rick Thaler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sutherland v. Stephens et al
as 4:2015cv00316
Plaintiff:
Ronald David Sutherland
Defendant:
William Stephens, Smith, Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
