Cases 41 - 50 of 73
Vasquez v. Mapes et al
as 4:2015cv00057
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Luis Vasquez
Defendant:
Terry Mapes, Jill Dursky, Scott Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. TN Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv01001
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
TN Department of Corrections, Law Enforcement Unit, Scott Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Mapes et al
as 4:2014cv00377
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Williams
Defendant:
Terry Mapes, Larry Lipscomb and Scott Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANTOS v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2014cv03472
Plaintiff:
JOSE SANTOS
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GARY M. LANIGAN, RAY HUGHES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Davis et al
as 1:2014cv01116
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Davis, Crowder, James Wilkes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Anderson v. John Baldwin, et al
as 14-1772
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Leroy Anderson
Defendant - Appellee:
John Baldwin, IDOC Director, Terry Mapes, Warden, Jill Dursky, Assoc. Warden and others
Wyatt v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2014cv00589
Plaintiff:
Tariq Wyatt
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Keri Moore, Mike Wenerowicz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Mapes et al
as 4:2014cv00048
Plaintiff:
Darrell Smith
Defendant:
Terry Mapes, Larry Lipscomb, Scott Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Kerestes et al
as 3:2013cv03076
Plaintiff:
Darrell Wilson
Defendant:
John Kerestes, Mayer, Bisel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alfonzo Salley v. Secretary Pennsylvania Departm, et al
as 13-3851
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALFONZO B. SALLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI, BRENDA LYNN TRITT, Deputy Superintendent and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
