Cases 41 - 50 of 453
TAYLOR v. MARION COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 1:2023cv00908
Plaintiff:
EZEKIEL I. TAYLOR, SR.
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS and TANESHA CREAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ELLIS v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2023cv00984
Plaintiff:
DEMAJIO JEROME ELLIS
Defendant:
WENDY KNIGHT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, GOBBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00303
Petitioner:
Willie Taylor and Willie Erving Taylor, Jr
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
REEDER v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2023cv00528
Plaintiff:
MARC BEREN REEDER
Defendant:
TASHA TAYLOR, BRETT WITTER, MARK MCCLEESE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
STRONG et al v. SMITH et al
as 1:2023cv00491
Plaintiff:
MARWIN DAVELLE STRONG
Defendant:
SMITH, TAYLOR, RIDDLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Hyatte et al
as 3:2023cv00183
Plaintiff:
Brian Taylor
Defendant:
William R Hyatte, George Payne, Jr and Kory Breaton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. HOLCOMB et al
as 2:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
CHRISTHOPER HOLCOMB, VARTHEL, RUSSELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
KEVIN WATSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, T. TAYLOR, TRACEY JOSLYN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
TAYLOR v. SEVIER
as 1:2022cv02390
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MACK TAYLOR
Defendant:
MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROUZIER v. JAFFE et al
as 1:2022cv02302
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL ROUZIER
Defendant:
B. JAFFE, CORIZON, ALFA FINOTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
