Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00808
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
James Roudabush, Jr. v. Theodore Nelson
as 14-7655
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
THEODORE C. NELSON, SA, U.S. Department of State, JASON CALLAHAN, Detective, Prince William County Police Department, STEPHAN HUDSON, Chief, Prince William Police Department and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv23786
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv06351
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Crenshaw v. U.S. Department of State et al
as 7:2012cv00459
Plaintiff:
Darren LaMar Crenshaw
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. Department of State
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-56548
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
James Kaufman v. Janet Napolitano, et al
as 12-5184
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James J. Kaufman
Defendant - Appellee:
Janet Ann Napolitano, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Secretary, U.S. Department of State and Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General, in his official capacity
SLUSS v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 1:2012cv00417
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW DAVID SLUSS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, UNKNOWN OFFICIAL and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv06779
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
