Cases 41 - 50 of 1,907
Phillips v. USA
as 1:2024cv00023
Petitioner:
Remon D Phillips
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
MCDONOUGH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00122
Petitioner:
JOHN MCDONOUGH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
CHANCELLOR v. KALLIS et al
as 2:2024cv00015
Petitioner:
KIMBERLY CHANCELLOR
Respondent:
STEVE KALLIS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
BROWN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
BRIAN L. BROWN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Best v. USA
as 2:2023cv00459
Petitioner:
Schickell Best
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355 Petition for Return of Property
ROBERTSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv02271
Petitioner:
FREDDIE ROBERTSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
LOMAX v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv02272
Petitioner:
ANTHONY LOMAX
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
DILL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv02112
Petitioner:
GEOFFRIE ALLEN LEE DILL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Smith, Jr. v. USA
as 1:2023cv00486
Petitioner:
Derrick A Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
