Cases 41 - 50 of 755
LEWIS v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 2:2019cv03962
Plaintiff:
KEITH L. LEWIS, JR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SMITH v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2019cv02389
Petitioner:
JOSEPH SMITH and ELIJAH SMITH-WEEKS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RODGERS v. MEEKS et al
as 1:2019cv00207
Respondent:
BOBBIE MEEKS and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Petitioner:
MARCUS RODGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RIVERA v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2019cv14023
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM BARR, WARDEN DAVID ORTIZ and others
Petitioner:
MANUEL RIVERA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
REAVES v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2019cv01443
Petitioner:
HAROLD REAVES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (C.S.C.O.A.)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WILSON v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2019cv01209
Respondent:
D.C. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and others
Petitioner:
KEWIONNE WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mutulu Shakur v. Louis Milusnic et al
as 5:2019cv00727
Respondent:
Louis Milusnic, Bureau of Prisons and United States Parole Commission
Petitioner:
Mutulu Shakur
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ASHBY v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2019cv00748
Respondent:
PATRICIA K. CUSHWA, CHARLES MASSARONE, UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and others
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ASHBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Webb-El v. United States Parole Commission
as 1:2019cv00774
Petitioner:
Keith Bryan Webb-El
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hines v. Johnson et al
as 1:2019cv00284
Defendant:
Calvin Johnson, United States Parole Commission, Patricia K. Cushwa and others
Plaintiff:
Herbert Hines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
