Cases 41 - 50 of 96
White et al v. Bailey et al
as 1:2017cv04067
Plaintiff:
Erik White and R. W.
Defendant:
Monica Bailey, Roshana Anderson, Myrna Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2017cv61013
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Hamlet v. North Broward Bureau Facility et al
as 0:2017cv60942
Plaintiff:
Lynn Edward Hamlet
Defendant:
North Broward Bureau Facility, Broward County Medical Department, Carlos Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sage-El v. Fino
as 17-1547
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Sage-El, FKA Winston Gregory Hall
Defendant - Appellee:
Police Officer Fino, # 3871, Weinstein, Tax #935466, Police Officer Beers, Tax #945458 and others
Guilfoil v. Weinstein
as 1:2017cv00171
Plaintiff:
Dale A. Guilfoil
Defendant:
Michael Weinstein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mackey v. Broward County Sheriff et al
as 0:2016cv62072
Plaintiff:
John Lewis Mackey , Jr.
Defendant:
Broward County Sheriff , Michael Davis and Peter Weinstein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carneglia v. Lynch et al
as 1:2016cv00663
Plaintiff:
Charles Carneglia
Defendant:
Loretta Lynch, Evan Norris and Hon. Judge Jack Weinstein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony A. Smith v. V-F Control
as 16-6064
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY ANTHA SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
V-F CONTROLS, JIM WEINSTEIN, (President) and CHARLES A. MCCLURE
Steven Weinstein v. William Stephens, Director
as 16-20018
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEVEN MARK WEINSTEIN
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Smith v. V-F Controls et al
as 3:2015cv00829
Plaintiff:
Anthony A. Smith
Defendant:
V-F Controls, Jim Weinstein and Charles A. McClure
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
