Cases 51 - 60 of 390
JACKSON v. HARPER et al
as 2:2021cv00399
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM P. JACKSON
Defendant:
CHIEF DEPUTY DAVID ZETWO, WARDEN ORLANDO HARPER, MAJOR ADAM SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JUBECK v. HARPER et al
as 2:2021cv00072
Defendant:
JASON BEASOM, MICHELLE GILDEA, ORLANDO HARPER and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK JUBECK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SALLEY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv00291
Defendant:
PHILA. COUNTY, OFFICER JOHNNY HIGHTOWER, OFFICER CRYSTAL WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff:
MARQUISE SALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. ALIQUIPPA CITY POLICE DEPT. et al
as 2:2021cv00008
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN, MRS. WHITE, C/O, MR. MINE, SEWICKLEY BORO POLICE and others
Plaintiff:
ENRICO ANTOINE JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
FORD v. SCI PINE GROVE et al
as 2:2020cv02023
Defendant:
SCI PINE GROVE, JEFFREY JACKSON, MD, WELLPATH HEALTH CARE and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN LEE FORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JACKSON v. HOLLAND et al
as 5:2020cv05207
Defendant:
CHERYL STEBERGER, LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON BOARD, MICHAEL HOLLAND and others
Plaintiff:
JAVEN TYLER JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. TICE
as 2:2020cv01387
Respondent:
ERIC TICE
Petitioner:
HUBERT JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JACKSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2020cv04197
Plaintiff:
NORRIS JACKSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
JACKSON v. ESTOCK et al
as 3:2020cv00168
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, LEE ESTOCK and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF JOHNSTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
BLAINE V. JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JACKSON v. DEMASKE et al
as 2:2020cv01226
Defendant:
RICHARDS, CORRECTIONS OFFICER GRIM, LIEUTENANT RAMIREZ and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
