Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 253
Randall v. Wall et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00255
Plaintiff: Charles Randall
Defendant: Ashbel T. Wall, Attorney General for the State of Rhode Island and State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Russell v. Ashbell T. Wall, II et al
as 1:2016cv00231
Plaintiff: Sandry J. Russell
Defendant: Ashbell T. Wall, II and Sergio Desousarosa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nickerson v. Wall
as 16-1558
Petitioner - Appellant: JASON LAMONTE NICKERSON
Respondent - Appellee: ASHBEL T. WALL
Evans v. Wall
as 16-1511
Petitioner - Appellant: LORENZO ROBINSON EVANS
Respondent - Appellee: ASHBEL T. WALL
Rodriguez v. Cabral et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00203
Plaintiff: Juan C. Rodriguez
Defendant: Cabral, Ashbel T. Wall, Matthew Kettle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edward Harmon v. C. Nguyen, et al
as 16-10449
Plaintiff - Appellant: EDWARD DERELL HARMON
Defendant - Appellee: OFFICER C. NGUYEN, OFFICER T. MCNEAL, OFFICER T. WALL and others
Oliveira v. Wall et al
as 1:2016cv00162
Petitioner: James Oliveira
Respondent: Ashbel T. Wall and State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Callahan v. Wall et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00160
Plaintiff: Ryan Callahan
Defendant: Ashbel T. Wall, Fred Vohr, Jennifer Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edward Harmon v. C. Nguyen, et al
as 16-10295
Plaintiff - Appellant: EDWARD DERELL HARMON
Defendant - Appellee: OFFICER C. NGUYEN, OFFICER T. MCNEAL, OFFICER T. WALL and others
Evans v. Wall, II We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00096
Petitioner: Lorenzo Robinson Evans
Respondent: Ashbel T. Wall, II and Attorney General for the State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?