Cases 51 - 60 of 429
(PC) Boston v. John Doe I et al
as 2:2022cv00655
Plaintiff:
Stevie Lee Boston
Defendant:
John Doe I, Jane Doe I and Jane Doe II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cabil v. Lessard et al
as 4:2022cv04052
Plaintiff:
Antwain Cabil
Defendant:
Jericho Lessard, Jane Doe and Jane Doe, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tucker v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2022cv03058
Plaintiff:
Joe Tucker, Jr
Defendant:
J B Pritzker, Rob Jeffreys, Brittney Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowrey v. Jeffreys et al
as 1:2022cv01087
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Lowrey
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Melvin Hinton, Shane Reister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stevie Lee Boston v. John Doe I et al
as 2:2022cv02299
Plaintiff:
Stevie Lee Boston
Defendant:
John Doe I, Jane Doe I and Jane Doe II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Brannon-Dortch et al
as 4:2022cv04024
Plaintiff:
Octavis Jones
Defendant:
Christine Brannon-Dortch, . Nicholson, Denise Fryrear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Orr v. Lessard et al
as 4:2022cv04018
Plaintiff:
Davon Orr
Defendant:
Jericho Lessard, Jane Doe and Jane Doe, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bass v. Shiner et al
as 5:2022cv00014
Plaintiff:
August D Bass
Defendant:
Daniel Shiner, John Doe, I and John Doe, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ciron B. Springfield v. Kathleen Allision et al
as 2:2022cv01220
Plaintiff:
Ciron B. Springfield
Defendant:
Kathleen Allision, Cherri Pham, CDCR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shores v. Henry County Jail
as 4:2022cv04026
Plaintiff:
Bryce Shores
Defendant:
Henry County Jail, Jericho Lessard, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
