Cases 51 - 60 of 70
KADONSKY v. KOCH et al
as 3:2014cv08105
Plaintiff:
STEVEN KADONSKY
Defendant:
BRIAN KOCH, SID. OFF. WISE, V. WOJCIECHOWICZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KADONSKY v. AHSAN, ET AL.
as 3:2014cv07248
Plaintiff:
STEVEN KADONSKY
Defendant:
ABU AHSAN , DONIQUE IVERY , NURSE LANCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reddick v. Crews et al
as 8:2014cv00816
Plaintiff:
Bryon Lythel Reddick
Defendant:
Michael Crews, Mary Farr, Druanne Briggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KELLY v. N.J. DEPT., OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2011cv07256
Plaintiff:
HAKIM KELLY
Defendant:
N.J. DEPT., OF CORRECTIONS, GEORGE ROBINSON, COMMUNITY EDUCATION CENTER (C.E.C) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andersen v. Condi et al
as 8:2010cv01634
Plaintiff:
Hans Christian Andersen
Defendant:
FNU Condi, Nora Moore, Phenel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CIPOLLA v. GEORGE W. HAYMAN et al
as 1:2010cv00889
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY CIPOLLA
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HAYMAN, GEORGE ROBINSON, RONALD RIGGINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Schwarzauer
as 1:2009cv00615
Plaintiff:
George Robinson
Defendant:
JoJo Schwarzauer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Schwarzauer (INMATE1)
as 2:2009cv00679
Plaintiff:
George Robinson
Defendant:
JoJo Schwarzauer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Clerk of the Circuit Court, Mobile County, Alabama et al(INMATE1)
as 3:2009cv00679
Plaintiff:
George Robinson
Defendant:
Clerk of the Circuit Court, Mobile County, Alabama and Jo Jo Schwarzayer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Secretary Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2009cv00801
Petitioner:
George Robinson
Respondent:
Secretary Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
