Cases 51 - 60 of 396
Darrough v. Hogg et al
as 4:2022cv00379
Plaintiff:
Audrey Darrough and Aundrey Darrough
Defendant:
Lenord Hogg, Phillip Green, Clint Todd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adair v. Hogg et al
as 4:2022cv00380
Plaintiff:
Holly Adair
Defendant:
Lenord Hogg, Phillip Green and Clint Todd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Hogg et al
as 4:2022cv00225
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Williams
Defendant:
Hogg, Phillip Green and Arkansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lucas v. Case et al
as 3:2022cv00050
Plaintiff:
William M Lucas
Defendant:
Robert Case, Bailey Burns, Mandi Quinn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Payne
as 4:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
Wardell Green
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. Walraven et al
as 4:2022cv04010
Plaintiff:
Jesse A. Green
Defendant:
Sheriff Bobby Walraven, Jail Administrator Gina Butler, Captain Tracy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burnett v. Franks et al
as 3:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
Cody Leslie Burnett
Defendant:
Steve Franks, Robert Case, Greene County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benton v. Higgins et al
as 4:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
Johnny Austin Benton
Defendant:
Eric S Higgins, Hendricks, Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watford et al v. Crow et al
as 6:2021cv06156
Plaintiff:
John Watford and Cydnee Watford
Defendant:
John Crow, Greg Keller and Clayton Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2021cv01152
Plaintiff:
Shaun C Allen
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Conway, City of, Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
