Cases 51 - 60 of 669
Diggs v. Doe
as 4:2023cv12593
Plaintiff:
Larry Dwayne Diggs
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Crump v. Nagy et al
as 4:2023cv12527
Plaintiff:
Victor Crump
Defendant:
Noah Nagy, Tiffani Kisor, White and others
Hale et al v. Clinton, County of et al
as 1:2023cv01063
Plaintiff:
Christopher Fisher, Dana Hale and William Pruesner
Defendant:
Clinton County, Chad Bashore, Jeffrey Armbrustmacher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bolden v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv12497
Plaintiff:
Gregory Bolden
Defendant:
John Doe A, John Doe B, John Doe C and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Deangelo et al
as 2:2023cv12509
Plaintiff:
Martell Jones
Defendant:
Jodi Deangelo, Godfrey, Nelson and others
White #838737 v. Chippewa Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
Marquise White #838737
Defendant:
Chippewa Correctional Facility, Unknown Desrochers, Chippewa Correctional Facility Warden's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Levitan v. Maclean et al
as 2:2023cv12439
Plaintiff:
Randall Richard Levitan
Defendant:
Maclean, Johnson, Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bolden #835167 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv00939
Plaintiff:
Gregory Bolden #835167
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi Washington, Gretchen Whitmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv12158
Plaintiff:
Jashaan Edwards
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Saginaw Correctional Facility, Unknown and others
Moore v. Saph
as 5:2023cv11815
Plaintiff:
Ricky Moore
Defendant:
J. Saph, E. Parr-Mirza, John Doe and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
