Cases 51 - 60 of 205
Croom v. Doe #6 et al
as 3:2022cv01244
Plaintiff:
Christopher Croom
Defendant:
John Doe #6, John Doe #7, John Doe #8 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daise v. Annucci et al
as 9:2022cv00459
Plaintiff:
Travis Daise
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, John/Jane Doe 1, John/Jane Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICE v. ROGERS
as 1:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant:
DANNY ROGERS, ARAMARK, INC., WELL PATH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Williamson et al
as 9:2022cv00174
Plaintiff:
Sincere Smith
Defendant:
ORC Williamson, ORC Rena, ORC Piersma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amaya Cruz et al v. Miami-Dade County et al
as 1:2022cv20314
Plaintiff:
Gabriela Amaya Cruz, Christian Pallidine and Angel Jae Torres Bucci
Defendant:
Miami-Dade County, Daniel Junior, Captain J Barber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sierra v. John Doe 22 et al
as 6:2022cv06042
Plaintiff:
Leonidas Sierra
Defendant:
John Doe 22, Captain Rzerniak, J. Fitchette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Inch et al
as 2:2021cv00859
Plaintiff:
Barry Sanders
Defendant:
Secretary Mark S. Inch, ICT Board John Doe1, ICT Board John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boswell v. Shah et al
as 3:2021cv01340
Plaintiff:
David M. Boswell, Jr.
Defendant:
Vipin Shah, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
House v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2021cv01050
Plaintiff:
LaDarryl House
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Anthony Wills, Lt. Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Croom v. Wills et al
as 3:2021cv00896
Plaintiff:
Christopher Croom
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, Josh Schoenbeck, Terrence Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
