Cases 51 - 60 of 210
Ruhbayan v. Smith et al
as 5:2021ct03133
Defendant:
William W. Wilkins, Rebecca Beach Smith, Robert B. King and others
Plaintiff:
Rajul Ruhbayan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KING v. BLACKWOOD et al
as 1:2021cv00383
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY ADELE KING
Defendant:
ORANGE COUNTY, TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA, CHARLES S. BLACKWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WATLINGTON v. KING et al
as 1:2021cv00314
Defendant:
A. KING, GUILFORD CO. JAIL and GUILFORD CO. SHERIFFS OFFICE
Plaintiff:
ERIQ MARQEUSS WATLINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson Bey et al v. Stone et al
as 5:2021ct03056
Defendant:
Captain Parker, Lt. Matthews, Keith Stone and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Wallace, Desmond King, Corey W. Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hudson v. Williamson et al
as 5:2020ct03370
Defendant:
Nurse Oxendine, Sgt. King, Officer Williamson and others
Plaintiff:
John Scott Hudson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DURHAM v. PAGE et al
as 1:2020cv01114
Defendant:
CARLYLE SHERRILL, ROWAN COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, GLORIA L. JONES and others
Plaintiff:
SHANNON LEE DURHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. COOPER et al
as 1:2020cv01090
Defendant:
KEVIN T. KING, ROY COOPER, TODD E. ISHEE and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID ANTHONY HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Durham v. Page et al
as 3:2020cv00672
Defendant:
Carlyle Sherrill, Rowan County District Attorneys Office, Gloria L. Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Shannon Lee Durham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King-El v. Wilson et al
as 1:2020cv00229
Defendant:
FNU Wilson, Saint T. Tapp and Jeffery E. James
Plaintiff:
Timothy D. King-El
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King-El v. Wilson et al
as 5:2020ct03261
Defendant:
Saint T. Tapp, Sgt. Wilson and Jeffery E. James
Plaintiff:
Timothy D. King-El
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
