Cases 51 - 60 of 76
Rivera-Crespo v. Molina-Rodriguez et al
as 3:2010cv02133
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Rivera-Crespo
Defendant:
Carlos Molina-Rodriguez, Victor Rivera-Percy and FNU Morales-Neftali
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jose Mota-Rivera v. John Haviland
as 10-17393
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSE LUIS MOTA-RIVERA
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN V. HAVILAND, Warden
Aguilar-Rivera v. USA
as 5:2010cv00155
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Aguilar-Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gonzalez-Rivera v. Matias, et al
as 10-2088
Petitioner - Appellant:
CARLOS LUIS GONZALEZ-RIVERA
Respondent - Appellee:
JUDITH MATIAS and ROBERTO SANCHEZ-RAMOS
Interested Party:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OF PUERTO RICO
Rivera-Crespo v. Pereida-Castillo et al
as 3:2010cv01673
Plaintiff:
Luis Alberto Rivera-Crespo
Defendant:
Miguel Pereida-Castillo, Wanda Montanez-Santiago, Roberto Cano-Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera-Crespo v. Pereida-Castillo et al
as 3:2010cv01648
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Rivera-Crespo
Defendant:
Miguel Pereida-Castillo, Wanda Montanez-Santiago, Roberto Cano-Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera-Crespo v. Molina-Rodriguez et al
as 3:2010cv01579
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Rivera-Crespo
Defendant:
Carlos Molina-Rodriguez and Colombani Guillermo-Somoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rivera-Crespo v. Somoza
as 3:2010cv01522
Plaintiff:
Luis Alberto Rivera-Crespo
Defendant:
Guillermo Somoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gonzalez-Rivera v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
as 10-1605
Petitioner - Appellant:
CARLOS LUIS GONZALEZ-RIVERA
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO
Respondent:
EDGARDO COLOMBA-RIVERA
Rivera-Crespo v. Perreira-Castillo et al
as 3:2010cv01394
Plaintiff:
Luis Alberto Rivera-Crespo
Defendant:
Miguel A Perreira-Castillo, Wanda Montanez, Roberto Cano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
