Cases 51 - 60 of 258
Fuller v. Jackson et al
as 5:2021ct03206
Plaintiff:
Johnathan A. Fuller
Defendant:
Denise Jackson, Stephen Waddell, Todd Ishee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thorpe v. USA
as 5:2021cv00275
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Stephen Thorpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
JAMES-EL v. HOOKS et al
as 1:2021cv00487
Defendant:
C. STARLING, MACRE R. CRIDER, MONICA BOND and others
Plaintiff:
HARRY SHAROD JAMES-EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SNOW v. SURRY CO JAIL
as 1:2021cv00287
Defendant:
SURRY CO JAIL
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN WADE SNOW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAMES-EL v. HOOKS et al
as 1:2021cv00159
Defendant:
C. STARLING, MACRE R. CRIDER, MONICA BOND and others
Plaintiff:
HARRY SHAROD JAMES-EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STALLINGS v. DURHAM COUNTY CORRECTIONAL et al
as 1:2021cv00069
Defendant:
WELLPATH (MEDICAL PROVIDER) and DURHAM COUNTY CORRECTIONAL
Plaintiff:
PHILIP STEPHEN STALLINGS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEPHENS v. BULLARD et al
as 1:2021cv00054
Defendant:
OFFICER KERTSETTER, LIEUTENENT BULLARD and OFFICER MORENO
Plaintiff:
GEORGE STEPHENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephens v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2020hc02207
Petitioner:
David Lydell Stephens
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Flynn v. Wilson et al
as 5:2020cv00521
Defendant:
John Doe Members of the Utilization Management Section, Stephen M Wilson, John and Jane Does, Medical Staff Employed by North Carolina Department of Public Safety and others
Plaintiff:
Catherine M Flynn and Catherine M. Flynn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flynn v. Wilson et al
as 5:2020ct03321
Defendant:
John Doe Members of the Utilization Management Section, Stephen M Wilson, John and Jane Does, Medical Staff Employed by North Carolina Department of Public Safety and others
Plaintiff:
Catherine M. Flynn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
