Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 21,772
Michael Hurley v. USA, et al
as 24-11841
Plaintiff: MICHAEL HURLEY
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF FLORIDA and SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03380
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11477
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Perales Jr. v. Mejia et al
as 2:2024cv00325
Plaintiff: Rene Perales Jr.
Defendant: Cesar Mejia, Brandon Fisher, David A. Boshofsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavers v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Polk County)
as 8:2024cv01366
Petitioner: Antwan Chavers
Respondent: Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cardona, Jr. v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Volusia County)
as 6:2024cv01031
Petitioner: Marcos Cardona, Jr.
Respondent: Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morgan Leppert v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11184
Petitioner: MORGAN AMANDA LEPPERT
Respondent: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
David Dussard v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-11752
Petitioner: DAVID DUSSARD
Respondent: SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Allen Franks v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-11774
Petitioner: ALLEN FRANKS
Respondent: SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Albert Anderson v. Reep
as 24-6339
Plaintiff: ALBERT ANDERSON
Defendant: REEP, Warden, DOUG NEWTON, Warden, FOOTHILLS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Prison and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?