Cases 51 - 60 of 21,765
Albert Anderson v. Reep
as 24-6339
Plaintiff:
ALBERT ANDERSON
Defendant:
REEP, Warden, DOUG NEWTON, Warden, FOOTHILLS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Prison and others
Leonardo Franqui v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-11887
Petitioner:
LEONARDO FRANQUI
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Briggs v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 2:2024cv14117
Plaintiff:
Janiecia Denise Briggs
Respondent:
Secretary Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Owens v. Secretary Department Of Corrections (Polk County)
as 8:2024cv00910
Petitioner:
Jesse Owens
Respondent:
Secretary Department Of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Albury v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (St. Lucie)
as 3:2024cv00555
Petitioner:
Sharonn Jhavar Albury
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Juares v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Pinellas County)
as 8:2024cv01255
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Juares
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00946
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00949
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Andre Griffin v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11768
Petitioner:
ANDRE GRIFFIN
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Daniel Masson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11004
Petitioner:
DANIEL B. MASSON
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
