Cases 51 - 60 of 97
Thomas v. TDCJ-CID, et al
as 7:2015cv00097
Plaintiff:
Billy Dwayne Thomas
Defendant:
TDCJ-CID, Brad Livingston, Stephen Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice Correctional Institutions Division et al
as 4:2015cv01617
Plaintiff:
Billy Thomas
Defendant:
Texas Department Of Criminal Justice Correctional Institutions Division, Brad Livingston, Stephen Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mireles v. Williams
as 7:2015cv00255
Plaintiff:
Gustavo Lopez Mireles
Defendant:
Stephen Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Benitez v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice Correctional Institutional Division et al
as 4:2015cv01530
Petitioner:
Cesar Benitez
Respondent:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice Correctional Institutional Division, Stephen Williams, Frank Hoke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cruz v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice et al
as 4:2015cv01550
Plaintiff:
Robert Baez Cruz
Defendant:
Texas Department Of Criminal Justice, Brad Livingston, Stephen Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Williams
as 4:2015cv00972
Petitioner:
Milton Gene Rogers
Respondent:
Stephens Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bailey v. Williams
as 4:2015cv00795
Petitioner:
Jonathan Deandre Bailey
Respondent:
Stephen Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bean v. Taylor et al
as 4:2015cv00695
Petitioner:
Joseph Lee Bean
Respondent:
Stephens William
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodman v. Williams et al
as 5:2015cv00070
Plaintiff:
Frederick Gean Goodman
Defendant:
Stephen Williams, Ronald Chism, Santrice Kearney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eagans v. Williams et al
as 4:2015cv00413
Plaintiff:
Richard Eagans
Defendant:
Stephen Williams, Tracy Bailey, Tiffany Bensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
