Cases 51 - 60 of 68
James v. Hubbard et al
as 2:2008cv01857
Plaintiff:
Charles Cornelius James
Defendant:
Suzan Hubbard, N. Grantis, Mike Knowles and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Savage v. Hubbard et al
as 2:2008cv01346
Plaintiff:
Bob Savage
Defendant:
Suzan Hubbard, R. L. Andreasen, Manuel Sabin and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Braley v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2008cv00758
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Braley
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Suzan Hubbard, Schwarzenegger and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cunningham v. Rodriguez et al
as 2:2008cv01215
Plaintiff:
Robert Cunningham
Defendant:
Rodriguez, Patricia Manderville, J.P. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wilson v. Kernan, et al
as 08-15396
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WAYNE WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT KERNAN, Director Adult Institutions, JAMES E. TILTON, Secretary CA Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation, SUZAN HUBBARD, Warden, California Medical Facility and others
Jones v. Hubbard et al
as 2:2007cv02682
Petitioner:
Wilton Eugene Jones
Respondent:
Suzan Hubbard and Attorney General CA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Savage v. Hubbard
as 1:2007cv01673
Petitioner:
Bob Savage
Defendant:
Suzan Hubbard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Savage v. Hubbard
as 2:2007cv02624
Petitioner:
Bob Savage
Defendant:
Suzan Hubbard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
v. Hubbard
as 5:2007cv03930
Plaintiff:
Darren Vincent Ford
Defendant:
Suzan Hubbard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Norwood v. Hubbard
as 1:2007cv00889
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Norwood
Defendant:
Suzan Hubbard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
