Cases 51 - 60 of 409
Covington v. Barnes
as 1:2021cv03780
Petitioner:
Demario Covington
Respondent:
United States of America, Warden of FCI Bennettsville and Nanette Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Richardson v. Warden, Bennettsville FCI
as 4:2021cv03230
Petitioner:
Curtis Richardson, Curtis D Richardson and Curtis Dale Richardson
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden, Bennettsville FCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Peregrina-Paez v. Warden of Bennettsville Federal Correctional Institution
as 8:2021cv03393
Petitioner:
Jose Peregrina-Paez
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden of Bennettsville Federal Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hernandez-Romero v. N. Barnes
as 0:2021cv03258
Petitioner:
Jose Hernandez-Romero
Respondent:
United States of America and N. Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. Warden of FCI Bennettsville
as 5:2021cv03025
Petitioner:
Jermaine Emmanuel Johnson
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden of FCI Bennettsville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Campos-Lagunas v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv03257
Petitioner:
Oscar Campos-Lagunas
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Henderson v. United States of America et al
as 5:2021cv03249
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Henderson
Defendant:
United States of America and Ofc Craig Snyder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatten v. United States of America et al
as 4:2021cv02912
Plaintiff:
Michael Hatten
Defendant:
United States of America and Warden Brian K. Dobbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Twitty v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv03078
Petitioner:
Reginald Antonio Twitty
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sanford v. United States of America
as 0:2021cv02552
Plaintiff:
Roderick Sanford
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
