Cases 51 - 60 of 65
Johnson v. Meir et al
as 1:2012cv01234
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Defendant:
. Meir, . Cremer, Newhall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mays v. Moore et al
as 1:2012cv01178
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Mays
Defendant:
J Moore, . Trainor, A Gorley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanson v. Haseltine, et al
as 12-1282
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL HANSON
Defendant:
STEPHEN CHURCH, in his official capacity as Superintendent of Rockingham County Department of Corrections, JOHN BLOMEKE, in his official capacity as Assistant Superintendent of Rockingham County Department of Corrections, FNU HORNE, Lieutenant and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE HASELTINE, a/k/a FNU Hazelton
Harnage et al v. Arnone et al
as 3:2012cv00107
Plaintiff:
James A. Harnage, Gregory Owens, James R. Waskowich and others
Defendant:
Leo Arnone, Anthony Coletti, Scott Erfe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanson v. Rockingham County Department of Corrections, Superintendent
as 1:2011fp00534
Defendant:
John Blomeke, FNU Consentino, Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Hanson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Hobart et al
as 1:2011cv01442
Plaintiff:
Amos E Mason
Defendant:
Patrick Hobart, . French, J Moor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Strickland v. Pierce et al
as 1:2011cv01067
Plaintiff:
Santaigo Strickland
Defendant:
Guy D Pierce, Marvin Reed, Michael Lemke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Burkhart v. Timme et al
as 1:2011cv00341
Plaintiff:
David Lee Burkhart
Defendant:
Rae Timme, Rae (I) Timme, Arthur Trainor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bardel v. Zavaras et al
as 1:2011cv00170
Plaintiff:
Dennis Bardel
Defendant:
Aristedes W. Zavaras, Rae Timme and Art Trainor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watters v. Mathy et al
as 1:2009cv01115
Plaintiff:
Henry E Watters
Defendant:
Joseph V Mathy, Troy Quinley, Larry Deathrage and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
