Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 77
Ratcliff v. USP Big Sandy We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2017cv00151
Petitioner: David Marc Ratcliff
Respondent: USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Reynolds-Bey v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2017cv00114
Petitioner: Donald-Ray Reynolds-Bey, (SPC)
Respondent: USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Abdul-Aziz Muhammad v. Dane Heady
as 17-6081
Plaintiff - Appellant: ABDUL-AZIZ RASHID MUHAMMAD
Defendant - Appellee: DANE HEADY, Retired Unit Manager, MICHAEL WEAVER, Health Service Administrator, EDDIE ANDERSON, DO and others
Hunter v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2016cv00124
Petitioner: Aaron Hunter-el
Defendant: USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Paul Weakley v. Unknown Parties, et al
as 16-5627
Plaintiff - Appellant: PAUL RAYMOND WEAKLEY
Defendant - Appellee: UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as Unknown SIS Officer at USP-Lee, Unknown SIS Officer at USP-Big Sandy, Unknown Officer at Big-Sandy, and R.P screening room, UNKNOWN HOBBS, UNKNOWN BAKER, Counselors and others
Corey Holder v. M. Sepanek, Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-30262
Petitioner - Appellant: COREY HOLDER
Respondent - Appellee: M. SEPANEK, Warden, USP Big Sandy
Torres v. USP Big Sandy, et al
as 7:2016cv00020
Plaintiff: Jesus Benitez Torres
Defendant: USP Big Sandy, Ruben Carmona, Mata Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carn v. USP Big Sandy Federal of Prison We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00768
Plaintiff: Danny Carn
Defendant: USP Big Sandy Federal of Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dye v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 7:2014cv00139
Plaintiff: Kevin Burna Dean Dye
Defendant: Bureau of Prisons, USP Big Sandy Staff and Special Investigative Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lodise Wadley v. Robert Farley
as 14-6045
Petitioner - Appellant: LODISE WADLEY
Respondent - Appellee: ROBERT FARLEY, Warden - USP Big Sandy

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?