Cases 51 - 60 of 4,302
Mills v. Scalf et al
as 7:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
William Matthias Mills
Defendant:
Officer S. Scalf, Officer Geldenhuys, Officer B. Akers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AlBritton v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 7:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
DeVinche Javon AlBritton
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Counselor Kayla Mallory, David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gary-Bey v. United States Federal Corporation et al
as 7:2024cv00281
Petitioner:
Gregory Tyrone Gary-Bey
Respondent:
United States Federal Corporation and Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Berry v. VDOC
as 24-6390
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ALLEN BERRY
Respondent:
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD
Biro v. Loudoun County JDR Court et al
as 1:2024cv00674
Plaintiff:
Riley Dyson Biro
Defendant:
Loudoun County JDR Court, Commonwealth of Virginia, Loudoun County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00252
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Brown v. Fayette County, West Virginia Prosecuting Attorney
as 2:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Robert I. Brown, Jr.
Defendant:
Fayette County, West Virginia Prosecuting Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dwayne Johnson v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 24-6367
Petitioner:
DWAYNE L. JOHNSON
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
