Cases 61 - 70 of 2,277
WILLIAMS v. SORBER et al
as 2:2023cv02982
Plaintiff:
SHAWN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
JAIME SORBER, JOHN E. WETZEL and GEORGE M. LITTLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lombardo v. Luzerne County et al
as 1:2023cv01245
Plaintiff:
Francis Lombardo
Defendant:
Luzerne County, Mark Rockovich, Ryan E. Flynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodloe v. Sage
as 4:2023cv01247
Petitioner:
Ronald E. Goodloe
Respondent:
Warden J. Sage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BRITT v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2023cv02861
Plaintiff:
JORI BRITT
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SECRETARY GEORGE E. LITTLE and DTS REV ULLI KLEMM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
STOLLAR v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2023cv02780
Plaintiff:
PATRICK STOLLAR
Defendant:
JOHN E WETZEL and PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ABUHADBA v. CHRISTINE
as 2:2023cv02623
Plaintiff:
MAHMOUD ABUHADBA
Defendant:
TINA WALKER, E. DAVID CHRISTINE, JR. and MICHELLE A HENRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2023cv01235
Plaintiff:
RASHAD M. WILLIAMS and MELVIN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, GEORGE LITTLE, LAUREL R. HARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ALONZO v. TERRA et al
as 2:2023cv02532
Plaintiff:
RONALD E. ALONZO
Defendant:
JOE TERRA, CHARLES HENSELY, LT. DIGUARDI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: OBE E.JOHNSON
as 2:2023cv02543
Plaintiff:
OBE E. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Talley v. Harry et al
as 1:2023cv01033
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
Dr. Laurel Harry, MHM, Inc., Pennsylvania Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
