Cases 61 - 70 of 93
PEREZ v. BROWN
as 2:2019cv00401
Plaintiff:
OSCAR PEREZ
Defendant:
RICHARD BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KROLIK v. PEREZ
as 2:2019cv00391
Defendant:
JOHN BYRD and JESSICA PEREZ
Plaintiff:
CHARLES KROLIK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matlock v. Sevier et al
as 3:2019cv00376
Plaintiff:
Barry W Matlock and Barry Wade Matlock
Defendant:
Greg Sheward, Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Captain Earhardt and others
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRUITT v. SMITH et al
as 2:2019cv00164
Defendant:
PEREZ, OMAR AHMAD, DIVISION OF CLINICAL HEALTH CARE and others
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND PRUITT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEREZ v. USA
as 1:2019cv00208
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
LUIS F. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Perez, Jr. v. Forgey et al
as 2:2018cv00295
Defendant:
Correctional Health Indiana, Inc., William Forgey, M.D., Unknown Employees of Lake County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Perez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PEREZ v. TERWILLINGERR et al
as 1:2018cv01233
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, JR. and JAMES G. TERWILLINGER
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BANKS v. SONG et al
as 1:2017cv02590
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, ROBERT CESSAR, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
PEREZ v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 3:2017cv00116
Miscellaneou:
BRANCHVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner:
JUAN PEREZ
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BANKS v. SONG et al
as 3:2017cv00112
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, ROBERT CESSAR, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
