Cases 61 - 70 of 104
Zunogama v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2014cv03013
Plaintiff:
Salvador Zunogama
Defendant:
Rick Raemisch, Ed Caley, Joseph M. Vigil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
QADR v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2014cv01443
Plaintiff:
NUR QADR
Defendant:
BRIAN V. COLEMAN, STEVEN GATES, TAMMY CESERINO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eric Richardson v. Superintendent Forest SCI, et al
as 13-4093
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC RICHARDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI, SGT. APODACA, ROBERT REED, Hearing Examiner and others
Archie Tindell v. Secretary PA Dept Corr, et al
as 13-3832
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARCHIE TINDELL
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, D. SKUNDA, M. LUCAS and others
Defendant - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
E. APODACA and HAGGERTY
Gerardo Perez Apodaca v. United States of America
as 2:2013cv06739
Petitioner:
Gerardo Perez Apodaca
Respondent:
United States of America
Eller v. Hartley et al
as 1:2013cv02029
Defendant:
Steve Hartley, Daryl Vigil, Renee Apodaca and others
Plaintiff:
William Eller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Apodaca v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2013cv01826
Petitioner:
Jose Apodaca
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Apodaca v. USA (2255: 2:99-cr-0140 TLN CKD)
as 2:2013cv00854
Petitioner:
Daniel Apodaca
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
RICHARDSON v. BURNS et al
as 1:2013cv00110
Petitioner:
ERIC RICHARDSON
Respondent:
DANIEL P. BURNS, APODACA, ROBERT REED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Larry Rosser v. H. Sanchez, et al
as 13-55610
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY ROSSER
Defendant - Appellee:
H. SANCHEZ, Correctional Officer, E. APODACA, Correctional Officer, R. CROMBIE, Correctional Officer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
