Cases 61 - 70 of 296
Cobble v. Cobb County District Attorney et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00570
Defendant:
Georgia Attorney General, Sumter County Sheriff, Judge Green and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Eric Cobble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00416
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Cobble v. US Attorney General et al
as 1:2019mc00015
Respondent:
Cherokee DA, GDC Commissioner, US Attorney General and others
Petitioner:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cobble v. US District Judges et al
as 5:2019ct03088
Defendant:
US Magistrate Judges, US District Judges and Fourth Circuit Court Judges
Plaintiff:
Daniel Eric Cobble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cobble v. US Attorney General
as 1:2019cv00518
Defendant:
US Attorney General
Plaintiff:
Daniel Eric Cobble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COBBLE v. CHEROKEE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY et al
as 1:2019cv00019
Respondent:
State Attorney General, US GOVERNMENT, CRISP COUNTY SHERIFF and others
Petitioner:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COBBLE v. COBB COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY et al
as 1:2019cv00013
Respondent:
COBB COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, US GOVERNMENT and COBB COUNTY SHERIFF
Petitioner:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COBBLE v. CHEROKEE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY et al
as 1:2019cv00012
Respondent:
CHEROKEE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, US GOVERNMENT and CHEROKEE COUNTY SHERIFF
Petitioner:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COBBLE v. BALDWIN COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 1:2019cv00014
Respondent:
BALDWIN COUNTY SHERIFF, BALDWIN COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY and US GOVERNMENT
Petitioner:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cobble v. U. S. Gov.
as 1:2019cv00203
Plaintiff:
Daniel Eric Cobble
Defendant:
U. S. Gov.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
