Cases 61 - 70 of 72
Weinhaus v. Vandergriff
as 4:2021cv00264
Respondent:
David Vandergriff
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Weinhaus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pickens III v. Vandergriff
as 5:2021cv06028
Respondent:
David Vandergriff
Petitioner:
Kenneth Pickens III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Roby III v. Vandergriff
as 4:2020cv01010
Respondent:
David Vandergriff
Petitioner:
Frank R Roby III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Manuel v. Vandergriff
as 4:2021cv00043
Respondent:
David Vandergriff
Petitioner:
Carlton L Manuel, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hightower v. Vandergriff
as 4:2020cv01701
Respondent:
David Vandergriff
Petitioner:
Jeremy Hightower
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Collier v. Vandergriff
as 4:2020cv01472
Respondent:
David Vandergriff
Petitioner:
Randy Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shattuck-Knaebel v. Vandergriff
as 2:2020cv04187
Petitioner:
Charles Shattuck-Knaebel
Respondent:
David Vandergriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Van Allen v. Lawson et al
as 4:2020cv01262
Defendant:
David Vandergriff, John Hagerty, Tami Lawson and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Van Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marin v. Griffith et al
as 4:2018cv01815
Defendant:
Brian Pettus, Shannon Montgomery, Cindy Griffith and others
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Marin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnell Bell, I v. George Lombardi, et al
as 16-3833
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Johnell A. Bell, I
Defendant - Appellee:
George A. Lombardi, Director of Missouri Department of Corrections, Individually and Officially, Dwayne Kempker, Terry Russell, Warden, ERDCC, Individually and Officially and others
Defendant:
Don Roper, FUM, ERDCC, (Retired), Individually and Officially, Tina Coffman, Nurse, ERDCC, Individually and Officially, John Montgomery, FUM, ERDCC, Individually and Officially and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
