Cases 61 - 70 of 119
Adarus Black v. DOJ, et al
as 14-5256
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Adarus Mazio Black
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Justice and Executive Office for United States Attorneys
Widi v. McNeil, et al
as 14-1468
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID J. WIDI, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL MCNEIL, TD BANKNORTH, N. A. and EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF, United States Attorneys
Defendant:
STEPHEN E. HICKEY, JR., CHRISTOPHER J. DURKIN, DALE L. ARMSTRONG and others
Alvin Dorsey v. EOUSA
as 14-5091
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Alvin Dorsey
Defendant - Appellee:
Executive Office for United States Attorneys
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hector Portillo v. USA, et al
as 14-5051
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Hector D Portillo
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, United States Department of Justice, Executive Office for United States Attorneys and others
James Murphy v. EOUSA
as 14-5044
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James E. Murphy
Defendant - Appellee:
Executive Office for United States Attorneys
Hector Portillo v. USA, et al
as 13-41312
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HECTOR D. PORTILLO
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS and others
Torrance Jones v. EOUSA
as 13-5336
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Torrance Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
Executive Office for United States Attorneys
Jason Dent v. EOUSA, et al
as 13-5291
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jason Dent
Defendant - Appellee:
Executive Office for United States Attorneys, Federal Bureau of Investigation and Federal Bureau of Prisons
BOYD v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEY et al
as 1:2013cv01304
Plaintiff:
WILLIE E. BOYD
Defendant:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEY and BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO & FIREARMS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
