Cases 61 - 70 of 120
Perez v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2023cv00402
Plaintiff:
Javier Hugo Perez
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Felipe Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ozuna-Barrera v. Martinez
as 2:2023cv00394
Plaintiff:
Margil Ozuna-Barrera
Defendant:
Felipe Martinez, Jr and F C I Oakdale II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ramirez-Suarez v. Martinez
as 2:2023cv00365
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Ramirez-Suarez
Defendant:
Felipe Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bolanos v. Martinez
as 2:2023cv00184
Plaintiff:
Jairo Bolanos
Defendant:
Felipe Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Portillo-Lozano v. Martinez
as 2:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
Jose Portillo and Jose Ariel Portillo-Lozano
Defendant:
Felipe Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bowers v. Martinez Jr
as 2:2023cv00126
Petitioner:
Brian M Bowers and Brian Michael Bowers
Respondent:
Felipe Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
STRAIN v. EBINGER et al
as 4:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DUANE STRAIN
Defendant:
REBECCA GOODHAME EBINGER and FELIPE MARTINEZ, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowers v. Martinez Jr
as 4:2023cv00030
Petitioner:
Brian M Bowers
Respondent:
Felipe Martinez Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gomez v. Martinez
as 2:2023cv00029
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Gomez
Defendant:
Felipe Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Alvin Darrell Smith v. United States et al
as 5:2022cv00702
Plaintiff:
Alvin Darrell Smith
Defendant:
United States, Michael D. Carvajal, Harley Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.