Cases 61 - 70 of 70
NIXON v. DIGUGLIELMO et al
as 2:2009cv01409
Plaintiff:
MARK A. NIXON
Defendant:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, MICHAEL A. LORENZO, George Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers et al v. DeKalb County, Georgia et al
as 1:2008cv03660
Plaintiff:
Larry Roy Rogers and George Robinson
Defendant:
DeKalb County, Georgia, Robert J. Castellani, Jeanie Canavan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Robinson et al
as 8:2008cv01510
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wayne Allen
Defendant:
George Robinson, R. N. Holton, Margret Kovacks and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Robinson v. Drew
as 1:2007cv02068
Petitioner:
Sydney George Robinson
Respondent:
D.B. Drew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JEFFERSON v. HAYMAN et al
as 1:2007cv05060
Plaintiff:
RONALD JEFFERSON
Defendant:
GEORGE HAYMAN, KATHARYN MACFARLAND and GEORGE ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Robinson et al
as 8:2007cv01908
Plaintiff:
Willie James Hill
Defendant:
George Robinson, John Doe, 1, John Doe, 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WAGENHOFFER v. IRELAND et al
as 1:2007cv03810
Plaintiff:
MARK WAGENHOFFER
Defendant:
KATHY IRELAND, ANDREA KINCHEN, GEORGE HAYMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COAR v. ROBINSON et al
as 2:2007cv02034
Petitioner:
ROBERT COAR
Respondent:
GEORGE ROBINSON and NEW JERSEY STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. Bel et al
as 8:2007cv00193
Plaintiff:
Ervin Thompson
Defendant:
Juan Bel and George Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rushing v. McDonough et al
as 8:2007cv00083
Plaintiff:
Tony L. Rushing
Defendant:
James McDonough, Ken Miller, Maxim Health Care Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
