Cases 61 - 70 of 488
Perry v. Hogg et al
as 4:2022cv00862
Plaintiff:
Gregory Michael Perry
Defendant:
Leonard Hogg, Amanda Rodgers, Chris Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2022cv01012
Plaintiff:
Joe D Cox
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Corrections, Arkansas Department of Human Services, UAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clendenig v. Does
as 4:2022cv01010
Plaintiff:
Joe Clendenig
Defendant:
Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grissom v. Freyder et al
as 4:2022cv00874
Plaintiff:
Wesley E Grissom
Defendant:
Charlie Freyder, Joe Page and Dale Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Griffin et al
as 4:2022cv00634
Plaintiff:
Brian James Hicks
Defendant:
Joe Griffin, James Moody, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Daniels et al
as 4:2022cv00577
Plaintiff:
Joe H Cook, III
Defendant:
C Daniels and F Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Graves et al
as 4:2022cv00492
Plaintiff:
Brunson Roberts
Defendant:
Solomon Graves, Dexter Payne, William Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Yates
as 2:2022cv00117
Plaintiff:
Joe Ernest Phillips
Defendant:
John P Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Willis v. McGilton et al
as 4:2022cv00532
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray Willis
Defendant:
Dammon Joe McGilton, John Crisman and Stone County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bethune v. Scott et al
as 4:2022cv00537
Plaintiff:
Joe Bethune
Defendant:
Scott, Dukes and Faulkner County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
