Cases 61 - 70 of 176
Bryan v. Kelly
as 5:2022hc02083
Petitioner:
David Anthony Bryan
Respondent:
Lynne B. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Evans v. Kelly
as 5:2022hc02081
Petitioner:
Bennelle Marquett Evans
Respondent:
Lynne B. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bell v. Kelly
as 5:2022hc02078
Petitioner:
Richard Anthony Bell
Respondent:
L. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Seleznev v. Leu
as 5:2022ct03139
Plaintiff:
Roman Seleznev
Defendant:
Warden Leu, R. Wright, L. Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SYMMES v. NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY - DPS et al
as 1:2022cv00225
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS ROY SYMMES, JR.
Defendant:
NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY - DPS, RONALD COVINGTON, JERRY INGRAM, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022hc02025
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
Kelly v. Ishee et al
as 5:2021ct03319
Plaintiff:
Johnny Kelly and Richard Wayne Goodman, Jr.
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Paula Smith, P.A. Tolman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TYLER v. WELCH et al
as 1:2021cv00473
Defendant:
SARA Q. LOBNER, KELLY WELCH, WILLIAM L. OSTEAN, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly v. United States Supreme Court et al
as 5:2021ct03148
Defendant:
Hon. William Matthewman, United States District Court "Miami", United States Courthouse "Judicial" and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TYLER v. GREENWOOD et al
as 1:2021cv00319
Defendant:
PAUL A. SHANNER, DYLAN W. GREENWOOD, ANTON T. MCALLISTER and others
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
