Cases 61 - 70 of 72
Ruston v. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints et al
as 2:2007cv00929
Plaintiff:
Lester Jon Ruston
Defendant:
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, Gordon B. Hinckley, Victor James Ruston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruston v. World Wrestling Entertainment
as 3:2007cv01650
Plaintiff:
Lester Jon Ruston
Defendant:
World Wrestling Entertainment and State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruston v. United States of America et al
as 4:2007cv40238
Plaintiff:
Lester Jon Ruston
Defendant:
United States of America, James K. Ellis, Tom Schneider and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Ruston v. Dallas County Texas et al
as 3:2007cv01076
Plaintiff:
Lester Jon Ruston
Defendant:
Dallas County Texas, James K Ellis, A Joe Fish and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Ruston v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2007cv40135
Plaintiff:
Lester Jon Ruston
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzalez, Harley Lappin, A. Joe Fish and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ruston v. Sabol
as 4:2007cv40124
Petitioner:
Lester Jon Ruston
Respondent:
Carolyn Sabol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ruston v. Quarterman
as 3:2007cv00551
Petitioner:
Lester Jon Ruston
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruston v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2007cv00097
Petitioner:
Lester Jon Ruston
Defendant:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruston v. State of Texas
as 1:2007cv00072
Petitioner:
Lester Jon Ruston
Respondent:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruston v. Abbott
as 1:2007cv00030
Plaintiff:
Lester Jon Ruston
Defendant:
Greg Abbott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
