Cases 61 - 70 of 152
Osborne v. Jail Staff
as 3:2021cv00795
Plaintiff:
James Willis Osborne, Jr
Defendant:
Jail Staff, Clothier and Lisa Hunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parsons v. Jail Staff et al
as 3:2021cv00802
Plaintiff:
Byron Keith Parsons and Byron K Parsons
Defendant:
Clovier, Jail Staff, Cloivier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NISSLEY et al v. THE GEO GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00880
Defendant:
C. HARPER, A. NEAL, WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KELLY NISSLEY and STEVEN NISSLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00761
Defendant:
LAURA BODKIN, DUSHAN ZATECKY, PAUL A. TALBOT and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WAYNE ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MONTGOMERY v. WARDEN OF USP TERRE HAUTE, IN et al
as 2:2021cv00020
Respondent:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL, JEFFREY ROSEN and WARDEN OF USP TERRE HAUTE, IN
Petitioner:
LISA MARIE MONTGOMERY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
AUSTIN v. WEXFORD HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS et al
as 1:2020cv03226
Defendant:
ANDERSON, WEXFORD HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS, SCHILLING and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY D. AUSTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAHAM v. BLONT et al
as 1:2020cv02986
Plaintiff:
JAMES GRAHAM
Defendant:
JOHNSON, JOHN and LISA BLONT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. IN State of et al
as 3:2020cv00910
Defendant:
Mark E Spitzer, IN State of and Lisa Glancy
Plaintiff:
Courtney Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAUDERDALE-EL v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 2:2020cv00486
Defendant:
KEITH HARTZELL, CORIZON CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIES, SUSAN SMOOTHERY and others
Plaintiff:
LAMONE LAUDERDALE-EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JESTER v. ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES et al
as 2:2020cv00461
Defendant:
LISA BOCK, ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES, DANIEL BEDWELL and others
Plaintiff:
RICKY JESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
