Cases 61 - 70 of 109
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood v. Lowndes County et al
as 1:2013cv00178
Petitioner:
Rita Wood
Respondent:
Lowndes County and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Lowndes County Jail
as 7:2013cv00016
Plaintiff:
Howard Joe Smith
Defendant:
Lowndes County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Lowndes County Jail
as 3:2013cv00010
Plaintiff:
Howard Joe Smith
Defendant:
Lowndes County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Lowndes County Jail
as 1:2013cv00388
Petitioner:
Howard Joe Smith
Respondent:
Lowndes County Jail
Battle v. GA Legislature et al
as 1:2012cv03344
Plaintiff:
Antonio Battle
Defendant:
GA Legislature, Superior Court of Clayton County, Superior Court of Bibb County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. GA Legislature et al
as 1:2012cv03343
Plaintiff:
Jamall D. Mathis
Defendant:
GA Legislature, Superior Court of Clayton County, Superior Court of Bibb County and others
Movant:
Robert Heard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lockett v. GA Legislature et al
as 1:2012cv03345
Plaintiff:
Theodore Lockett
Defendant:
GA Legislature, Superior Court of Clayton County, Superior Court of Bibb County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. GA Legislature et al
as 1:2012cv03346
Plaintiff:
Vashun Mitchell
Defendant:
GA Legislature, Superior Court of Clayton County, Superior Court of Bibb County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Lowndes County Detention Center et al
as 1:2012cv00206
Petitioner:
Eric Darnell Harris
Respondent:
Lowndes County Detention Center, Lowndes County Sheriff Department, Mississippi Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
