Cases 61 - 70 of 336
McQueen v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv00338
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Fountain Correctional Facility
Plaintiff:
Marcus D. McQueen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. McQueen et al
as 1:2020cv00731
Defendant:
Joseph A. Noeth, S. Michalek, Dr. McQueen and others
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McQueen v. Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00389
Plaintiff:
Marcus D. McQueen
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Department of Corrections and Fountain Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McQueen v. Alabama Department of Corrections
as 2:2020cv00813
Plaintiff:
Marcus DeWayne McQueen
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McQueen v. Department of Corrections (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00386
Defendant:
Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Marcus D. McQueen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00380
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fourstar et al v. McQueen et al
as 4:2020cv00045
Defendant:
Jessie Slaughter and Cascade County
Plaintiff:
David McQueen, Victor Charles Fourstar, Jr. and Bruce Denny
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McQueen v. Cahoe et al
as 2:2020cv02117
Defendant:
Vermilion County Sheriffs, . Douglas, . Cahoe and others
Plaintiff:
Jermaine McQueen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abbatiello v. Legrow et al
as 1:2020cv00586
Defendant:
Matthew Keating, Brian Daly, T-Mobile U.S.A Law Enforcement Relations and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony A. Abbatiello
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McQueen v. Hartshorn
as 2:2020cv02102
Respondent:
Patrick Hartshorn in his individual and official capacity as Sheriff of Vermillion County
Petitioner:
Jermaine McQueen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
