Cases 61 - 70 of 6,053
Donald Higgs v. New Jersey Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-1712
Plaintiff:
DONALD D. HIGGS
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, VICTORIA L. KUHN, Esq., NJ DOC Commissioner, M. CHERY, Corrections Officer and others
MICHEL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2024cv00175
Petitioner:
JEFFREY MICHEL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Silver v. Christopher et al.
as 1:2024cv00690
Plaintiff:
Terrell L. Silver and Mr. Silver
Defendant:
Associate Warden Philip Christopher, Warden Michelle Henry, Associate Warden Damara Shemo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stratton v. Miller
as 2:2024cv00667
Petitioner:
Jaime Michelle Stratton and Jared Michael Clark
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holmes v. Glaser et al
as 1:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
Brian Isiah Holmes, Jr.
Defendant:
Angela J. Glaser, Maria Christine Palermo and Michelle Agresta Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Dauzat
as 5:2024cv00536
Plaintiff:
Lamont Johnson
Defendant:
Michelle Dauzat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02257
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
