Cases 61 - 70 of 229
Keen v. Clear et al
as 7:2020cv00693
Defendant:
Steve Clear, Southwest Virginia Regional Jail (Duffield), Counselor Starnes and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Adam Keen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keen v. Clear et al
as 7:2020cv00608
Defendant:
Steve Clear, Southwest Virginia Regional Jail Authority, Trish McCoy and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Adam Keen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jarrett v. Regional Jail Authority et al
as 2:2020cv00625
Defendant:
Regional Jail Authority and South Central Reg Jail
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Jarrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jarrett v. Regional Jail Authority et al
as 7:2020cv00552
Defendant:
Regional Jail Authority and South Central Reg. Jail
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Jarrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Halter v. Newton et al
as 7:2020cv00542
Defendant:
Officer Benson, Middle River Regional Jail Authority, Jefery Newton and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Norbert Halter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Halter v. Newton et al
as 7:2020cv00493
Defendant:
Middle River Regional Jail Authority, Captain Powell, Sgt. Brandon Marshall and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel N. Halter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calloway v. Blue Ridge Regional Jail Authorities, et al
as 7:2020cv00479
Plaintiff:
Shawn C. Calloway
Defendant:
Unknown, Jones, Westin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler v. Western Virginia Regional Jail Authority
as 7:2020cv00437
Defendant:
Western Virginia Regional Jail Authority
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vegas v. Southwest Regional Jail Authority
as 7:2020cv00372
Defendant:
Southwest Regional Jail Authority
Plaintiff:
Chester Pierre Vegas, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Walthall, et al
as 3:2020cv00446
Defendant:
James H. Davis, Rajah Walthall, Piedmont Regional Jail Authority and others
Plaintiff:
Carrie Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
