Cases 61 - 70 of 161
COPELAND v. PARTRIDGE et al
as 4:2018cv00140
Plaintiff:
SHANNON COPELAND
Defendant:
PARTRIDGE, CHAD SMITH, PHINNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Copeland v. Partridge et al
as 5:2018cv00082
Plaintiff:
Shannon Copeland
Defendant:
FNU Partridge, Chad Smith, FNU Phinney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alan Sajous v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 18-10612
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALAN SAJOUS
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, FCC COLEMAN PRISON COMPLEX, FCC COLEMAN - LOW and others
Shuler v. Severson et al
as 2:2018cv14027
Plaintiff:
Joshua Issiah Shuler
Defendant:
Lars Severson, Captain Rogers, Officer Eschevarria and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reynolds v. Third Circuit Public Defenders Office et al
as 4:2017cv03469
Plaintiff:
Nathanael L Reynolds
Defendant:
Third Circuit Public Defenders Office, Jack D. Howie and Amanda Shuler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shuler v. Rowley
as 5:2017cv03423
Plaintiff:
Philip Shuler
Defendant:
Shamika Ann Rowley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Management & Training Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv02426
Plaintiff:
Aaron E Young
Defendant:
Management & Training Corporation , MTC Medical LLC , Neil Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gilmore v. Blanketship, et al
as 1:2017cv00729
Plaintiff:
Sean Gilmore
Defendant:
Blanketship, Mr. Turner, Warden, Warren Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wykle v. Davis et al
as 3:2017cv02211
Plaintiff:
Travis Jay Wykle
Defendant:
Michael Davis, Neil Turner, Rebecca Joyce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REYNOLDS v. THIRD CIRCUIT PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE et al
as 1:2017cv02057
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL L. REYNOLDS
Defendant:
THIRD CIRCUIT PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE, JACK D. HOWIE and AMANDA SHULER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
