Cases 61 - 70 of 88
Farrakhan v. Johnson et al
as 1:2010cv00924
Plaintiff:
Shaka Amir Farrakhan
Defendant:
Gene Johnson, J. Jabe, Stevens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaka Senegal Muhammad v. Mary Hanlon et al
as 2:2010cv05212
Defendant:
Detective M. J. Beck, Detective M. J. Beck, Mary Hanlon and others
Plaintiff:
Shaka Senegal Muhammad
Shaka Senegal Muhammad v. James Pernell Cooper III et al
as 2:2010cv02586
Defendant:
James Pernell Cooper, III and James Pernell Cooper, III
Plaintiff:
Shaka Senegal Muhammad
Muhammad v. Sisto et al
as 2:2010cv00143
Plaintiff:
Shaka Senegal Muhammad
Defendant:
D.K. Sisto, W. Rodriguez, M.B. Miles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaka Muhammad v. D. Sisto, et al
as 09-17320
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAKA SENEGAL MUHAMMAD
Defendant - Appellee:
D. K. SISTO, S. CERVANTES and T. MOORE
Muhammad v. Sisto
as 2:2009cv02503
Petitioner:
Shaka Senegal Muhammad
Respondent:
D.K. Sisto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Muhammad v. Sisto
as 2:2009cv02008
Petitioner:
Shaka Senegal Muhammad
Respondent:
D. K. Sisto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shaka Muhammad v. The Los Angeles Superior Court, et al
as 09-56054
Petitioner - Appellant:
SHAKA SENEGAL MUHAMMAD
Respondent - Appellee:
THE LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Real Party in Interest
Farrakhan v. Johnson et al
as 7:2009cv00233
Plaintiff:
Shaka Amir Farrakhan
Defendant:
Gene Johnson, Eric Madsen, Duncan Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaka Farrakhan v. Gene Johnson
as 09-6991
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAKA AMIR FARRAKHAN
Defendant - Appellee:
GENE JOHNSON, Director, J. JABE, Deputy Director, A. TEKLU, Medical Director and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
