Cases 61 - 70 of 2,697
Carson v. State of Texas
as 4:2024cv00186
Petitioner:
Michael James Carson
Respondent:
State of Texas and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hallman v. The State of Texas et al
as 4:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Robert F Hallman
Defendant:
The State of Texas, Detective McKee FNU, Ashlea Deener and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Krikie v. State of Texas
as 3:2024cv00484
Plaintiff:
David Paul Krikie
Defendant:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poling v. State of Texas
as 3:2024cv00494
Petitioner:
Larry Eugene Poling
Respondent:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00159
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1455 Notice of Removal of Criminal Prosecution
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00421
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1455 Notice of Removal of Criminal Prosecution
Branch v. State of Texas et al
as 6:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
James Branch
Defendant:
State of Texas, Parnell McNamara, Luke McKowen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruiz v. State of Texas
as 3:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Roel Ruiz, Sr.
Defendant:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welsh v. Correct Care Recovery
as 24-10111
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Defendant:
Correct Care Recovery Solutions, Bryan Thomas, Principle Agent in the State of Texas, Chris Woods, Individually as Director of Security, Texas Civil Commitment Center for Correct Care Recovery Solutions and others
Black v. The People of the State of Texas
as 4:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
J. B. Black
Defendant:
The People of the State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
