Cases 61 - 70 of 78
Kumar v. Johnson et al
as 2:2016cv00768
Plaintiff:
Anil Kumar
Defendant:
Jeh Johnson, Sarah Saldana, Thomas Homan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clarke v. Crawford et al
as 3:2015cv00732
Petitioner:
Andre Richard Clarke
Respondent:
Jeffrey Crawford, M. Yvonne Evans, Thomas Homan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bonilla v. Hunter et al
as 1:2015cv00631
Petitioner:
Maurico Turcios Bonilla
Respondent:
Donald Hunter, M. Yvonne Evans, Thomas Homan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Olmos v. Johnson et al
as 1:2015cv00965
Petitioner:
Manuel Olmos
Respondent:
Jeh Johnson , Sarah Saldana , Thomas Homan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00133
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Alimany Turay v. Jack Kavanagh
as 14-7649
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALIMANY ALUSINE TURAY
Respondent - Appellee:
JACK KAVANAGH, Warden, CALVIN MCCORMICK, Baltimore Field Office Director, THOMAS HOMAN, Director and others
Turay v. Baker County Sheriff et al
as 3:2014cv01192
Petitioner:
Abu Bakarr Turay
Respondent:
Baker County Sheriff, Marc Moore, Jim Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mohamed v. Hunter et al
as 1:2014cv00786
Petitioner:
Khalid Abdel Whab Mohamed
Respondent:
Donald Hunter, M. Yvonne Evans, Thomas Homan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gerardo Mendoza Lopez v. Jeh Johnson, et al
as 14-16196
Petitioner - Appellee:
GERARDO MANUEL MENDOZA LOPEZ
Respondent - Appellant:
JEH JOHNSON, Secretary of Homeland Security, ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, TIMOTHY S. AITKEN, Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00227
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
