Cases 61 - 70 of 94
McCallum v. Horlacher
as 2:2014cv00459
Defendant:
Horlacher
Plaintiff:
James McCallum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abrams v. Florida Department Of Corrections et al
as 6:2014cv00027
Plaintiff:
Eugene Abrams
Defendant:
Florida Department Of Corrections, Secretary, Department of Corrections, Warden, Central Florida Reception Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CORDOVANO v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2014cv00008
Plaintiff:
SALVATORE P CORDOVANO
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, NORTHWEST FLORIDA RECEPTION CENTER ANNEX, MICHAEL D CREWS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REDDING v. SIMCOX
as 4:2013cv00408
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL REDDING
Defendant:
CATHY SIMCOX, A BUCURELLI, DAVID MCCALLUM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCallum v. Nevens et al
as 2:2013cv00962
Defendant:
Barrett, Jennifer Nash, Dwight Nevens and others
Plaintiff:
James Kenneth McCallum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCallum v. High Desert State Prison
as 2:2013cv00815
Defendant:
High Desert State Prison
Plaintiff:
James K. McCallum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Florida Dept. of Corrections et al
as 6:2013cv00716
Plaintiff:
Kenneth C. Davis
Defendant:
Florida Dept. of Corrections, Eber Nieves, D. W. McCallum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roush v. Warden
as 2:2013cv00020
Petitioner:
Rick Roush
Respondent:
David McCallum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sherman v. Clark County et al
as 6:2013cv06017
Plaintiff:
Patrick Sherman
Defendant:
Clark County, Henry Morgan, Dub Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tina Emerson v. McCallum
as 12-3920
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Tina Enerson
Defendant - Appellee:
McCallum, Circuit Judge, Clark County
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
