Cases 71 - 80 of 2,926
Flores v. USA
as 1:2023cv00217
Petitioner:
Alejandro Cisneros Flores
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
YEANAY v. BRANHAN et al
as 1:2023cv01948
Plaintiff:
MARKUS YEANAY
Defendant:
D. BRANHAN, C. SWEASON, III, ISSAC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Brown v. Flores et al
as 2:2023cv02487
Plaintiff:
Hameed J. Brown
Defendant:
Flores, Colledge and While
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Sgt. Hampton et al
as 3:2023cv01978
Plaintiff:
Michael Lenior Smith
Defendant:
Sgt. Hampton, C/O Flores and C/O Colon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Derek Leon Marcus Smith v. Captain Flores
as 5:2023cv02220
Petitioner:
Derek Leon Marcus Smith
Respondent:
Captain Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller et al v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv15320
Plaintiff:
Rodney Miller, Eric Miller, Edwin G. Enger and others
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, Don Beachem and Ms. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) McGee v. Flores-Lopez et al
as 1:2023cv01523
Plaintiff:
Isaish McGee
Defendant:
G. Flores-Lopez, C. Rehkopf and A. Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) McGee v. Flores-Lopez et al
as 2:2023cv02406
Plaintiff:
Isaish McGee
Defendant:
G. Flores-Lopez, C. Rehkopf and A. Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Claudio v. PIA Industries Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01965
Plaintiff:
Robert Claudio
Defendant:
PIA Industries Inc., Bierbaum, CDCR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Yapoujian (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2023cv02703
Plaintiff:
Alishan Yapoujian
Defendant:
Moses Stancil, Ryan Flores, Zachary Witt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
